When a bank
is working on a case, there are generally three different methods they use to
win their case. These methods include going to court without a banking expert
and discrediting the expert on the other side, choosing an expert that works at
their own institution, or choosing an expert who works at a bank that is in the
area. We're here to tell you why these methods do not work.
The main
problem with these methods is that they are more often seen as defensive
methods. By trying to discredit the other witness, it makes the bank seem like
they are badgering the other side, making them look like nothing but big
bullies. When they choose someone who works in the bank, they are not
presenting a non-biased opinion. Naturally, someone who works for the bank is
going to have the bank's best interests in mind. Why would they throw their own
employer under the bus? Last, when they choose someone who works at another
local bank, they are choosing someone who is too close to the situation. Jurors
like to see someone who is not connected to the case at hand providing them
with information about the industry and it's many policies.
When you
need a dependable, independent bank expert
witness, Michael F. Richards is available to assist you.
No comments:
Post a Comment